DON'T SEND THAT

Think you'd never send the wrong reply? Think again. Can you even beat a cartoon at texting? (no offence Judgy)

How to play

  • Two replies. Their text can already be the trap.
  • One button flips A/B SPACE. Timer sends the highlight.
  • Beat Judgy at 80%. Miss, and you join the weaker-texts ledger.
Don't Send That · vs Judgy

Methodology · open if you dare Judgy didn't read it either. That's why he's cocky at 80%.

How this is built

Patterns, not quotes

Scenarios are original SMS illustrations of patterns from multiple research lines. demand–withdraw (Christensen), PREP danger signs (Markman/Stanley), Rusbult accommodation, Linehan/Fruzzetti validation, Freyd DARVO, attachment/EFT, maintenance research, and Gottman conflict work. Not therapy. Not private chats.

Speech feel informed by natural dialogue corpora (Cornell), not quoted film lines · see dont-send-communication-report.md

Their text can already be the trap

Sometimes the incoming message is the test: guilt, contempt, ultimatums, fake check-ins. The healthier reply is rarely the longest or the nicest. Often it's the one that won't train a bad pattern.

Timer = decide while a little flooded · that's the point

You
0 / 7 better
0%
Judgy
Judgy · beat this
80%
Round 1 / 7 · context Loading…
The text
Them …
Choose the reply

SPACE toggle · GO or zero sends

Sends at zero 20.0

One button flips A/B · timer sends the highlight

Judgy
You lost to a cartoon

Judgy wins

Your accuracy
0%
Judgy
80%
Better picks
0 / 7
Drop your real chat on amitoxic.me →

Done playing pretend fights?

Don't Send That · vs Judgy

This is a game, not therapy. Scenarios are original, inspired by relationship-research patterns (repair, soft startups, flooding, bids). Incoming texts can already be toxic. The healthier reply is usually the one that keeps a door open without eating glass or training a worse pattern.